ARTICLE

Canada Environmental Impact Studies Must Include Gender Identity?

News Image By Jonathon Van Maren/The Bridgehead April 13, 2018
Share this article:

Perhaps you thought that after Trudeau was widely mocked for his "peoplekind" comment, and the Liberal gender budget flopped, and Canadians collectively groaned at the news that their government was going gender-neutral, that perhaps the Liberals realized it was time to lay low on the subject of gender for awhile. 

If so, you thought wrong. Consider this latest news update from Trudeau-land, in the National Post:

Over the years, federal environmental assessments have measured everything from the number of endangered lynx near a proposed New Brunswick mine to the presence of dragonflies and butterflies at a British Columbia hydro site. But under new federal legislation tabled in February, the scope of impact assessments is being broadened well beyond fauna, requiring project proponents to take into account "the intersection of sex and gender with other identity factors."


What does that mean, you ask? It turns out that nobody has any idea:

Part of the Liberal government's embrace of gender-based analysis, the new provision has left environmental lawyers puzzled over how the provision will work if the bill becomes law.

"If you're asking, 'What does that mean?' I'm going to have to say I don't really know," said Richard Lindgren, a staff lawyer at the Canadian Environmental Law Association. "I'll wait for the guidance and direction from the government on this one."

In a report on the legislation, the law firm Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP said the new gender provision makes "the role of an impact assessment more of a policy-setting exercise than focused on the merits of a specific project, which is likely to increase the scope of studies the proponents will need to engage in and contribute to overall project uncertainty."

Roughly translated, "contributes to overall project uncertainty" means "this is extremely stupid, counter-productive, and impossible to implement without compromising the work we are actually supposed to do." The Liberals, it seems, are happy to forcibly insert gender into every imaginable field, regardless of how inconvenient or ridiculous that is. More:


Jessica Kennedy, a lawyer at Osler's Calgary office and co-author of the report, called the initiative "novel." Gender impacts have been considered in the past, for example when looking at employment rates on work sites. But Bill C-69 seems to be suggesting something much larger.

"What is more concerning is if you take the issue of gender and gender identity more broadly and start examining, for example, a company's policies and practices regarding gender, their hiring practices, their bathroom policies, their codes of ethics around treatment of people based on gender or other identity factors -- race religion, those kinds of things," Kennedy said. "That's where it starts to get more into a policy question, where you're really looking at the social setting within the company."

The law firm Dentons similarly flagged the gender language as a source of uncertainty, "since it is not clear how these factors, which are subjective and difficult to assess, will be applied."

Bernie Roth, a lawyer in Dentons' Calgary office, said the meaning of the new language on gender remains unclear, but he speculated it could be a tool to increase gender diversity in male-dominated trades. Patrick McDonald, director of climate and innovation at the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, said his industry is awaiting further clarification from the government on the meaning of the change. "There is going to be some learning and some adaptation," he said.

The preamble to the bill, the Impact Assessment Act, declares that the government "is committed to assessing how groups of women, men and gender-diverse people may experience policies, programs and projects and to taking actions that contribute to an inclusive and democratic society."

And here you thought this was about environmental protections and ensuring the survival of endangered species. Not anymore--it's about how a gender-diverse non-binary person experiences Canadian environmental programs--or perhaps how to increase trans representation in "male-dominated trades."

Ladies and gentlemen, your tax dollars at work.

Originally published at The Bridgehead - reposted with permission.


Other News

June 18, 2018Canada's Supreme Court Rules Against The Bible

In a ruling that is sure to send shock waves through the nation, Canada's Supreme Court ruled 7-2 against Trinity Western University's Law...

June 18,2018Fathers Day Confusion As Trans Mothers Want to Be Fathers

In what might be the most ridiculous Father's Day article ever, CNN recently ran a piece titled, "He gave birth. He breastfed. Now, he wan...

June 18, 2018C. S. Lewis, The Great War & The Road To Narnia

Did you know the road to Narnia began 100 years ago this Spring in the trenches of France during World War I?...

June 18, 2018Escaping Reality: Fortnite Game Addiction Is Real

Fortnite is the most popular video game in the entire world right now with over 40 million downloads however for some people it is literal...

June 15, 2018This Week In The Gender Wars

Two biological males took home all of the top prizes at the Connecticut state track and field championships in the female division as more...

June 15, 2018Skyrocketing Health Care Costs Destroying The Middle Class

Families all over the country are being absolutely crushed by extremely high health insurance premiums, ridiculously high deductibles and ...

June 15, 2018Heads Turn Away When It Comes To The Islamization Of Europe

Once again, Hezbollah flags flew in London last weekend at the Iran-supporting "Al Quds" march in Britain's capital city....

Get Breaking News