ARTICLE

A Killer Bonus: Canada Weighs Paying Docs Extra For Assisted Suicide

News Image By John Stonestreet/Breakpoint.org August 08, 2017
Share this article:

Faced with doctors' growing resistance to assisted suicide, some Canadian advocates are asking, "What if we just pay them more?"

Thirteen months ago, Canada legalized doctor-assisted suicide, or as Canada calls it, "medical assistance in dying."

From the start, Eric Metaxas and I have said that our northern neighbors have placed their entire society on a slippery slope on which the "right to die" will eventually become the "duty to die"--just as it's happened everywhere else.

Nothing in the past thirteen months suggests Canada will be an exception.

Elderly patients diagnosed with cancer are immediately asked if they wish to be euthanized; "ethicists" strongly urge that the organs of the euthanized not go to waste; and policy proposals to extend the "right to die" to "the mentally ill" are now being advanced.


Notwithstanding this parade of horribles, there's one bit of good news: Many doctors who initially expressed a willingness to lend deadly so-called "medical assistance" have changed their minds. 

Unfortunately, the growing reticence of early practitioners to continue offering this lethal service is not because they now take the moral qualms seriously. No, the problem is that they're not being paid enough to kill their patients.

I wish I were making this up but, sadly, I'm not.

An article in the July 12th issue of the Canadian magazine MacLean's asked "Should doctors be paid a premium (for) assisting deaths?" The author tells us that as "staunch supporters of physician-assisted dying are avoiding taking up the work ... advocates of the service worry it will exist in theory only, and not in practice."


The solution, according to the author, is to pay doctors more. While she acknowledges that "medically assisted dying is still controversial in Canada," and that "paying someone a premium to do this work can be construed as ethically compromising," she still thinks the problem is one of incentives.

This notwithstanding a 2015 survey by the Canadian Medical Association, which found that "only 29 per cent of doctors would consider providing the service, and that was before they knew doing so could be financially detrimental." (Emphasis added.)

Who knows whether the proposal to pay doctors extra for killing their patients will go anywhere. What is clear though, is the fanaticism and moral obtuseness of assisted suicide advocates. For them, the problem isn't that the vast majority of Canadian doctors have moral qualms about killing their patients--it's the pay is too low.

This reminds me of something Ben Mitchell of Union University said: "Whenever you put a price tag on something that is priceless, you cheapen it." In this case two priceless things--the sanctity of human life and the duty of care doctors owe their patients--have been cheapened in the service of a false idea of what it means to be compassionate.


No, real compassion towards the sick and dying is on display in countless hospices, yet another gift of Christianity to the modern world. There, palliative care is combined with concern for the person's spiritual and emotional needs. The result, as my friend from New Zealand, John Fox, has written, is a powerful witness to the fact that pain and death are "a team sport."

The Christian alternative to bribing doctors to kill patients is, in Fox's words, to surround them with "solidarity, the love of caring families, and the competence of medical professionals." In doing so, "we can carry together the experience of suffering, find meaning and stillness inside it, say the things that should be said, and make and receive the peace we need."

As the "culture of death" spreads, it's imperative that Christians model and dramatically expand the sort of palliative care that Fox writes about. In his words in an email to me, "we must be the people who care for our sick and elderly--we must be the people who don't kill their children or throw away grandma."

In other words, we must show the world real compassion so that it can reject the cheap substitute currently being peddled.

Originally published at Breakpoint.org - reposted with permission.




Other News

December 22, 2025A Very Woke Christmas: Progressive Churches Celebrate With Drag Performances

Will we proclaim a Gospel that transforms the world, or reshape the Gospel so the world will applaud us? Progressive churches hosting drag...

December 22, 2025AI Deepfakes Are Driving the Internet Toward Biometric Control

Many security experts openly say it will take just one major incident--one deepfake that crashes markets, triggers mass panic, or escalate...

December 22, 2025Restoring Chaplains To The Spiritual Backbone Of Our Military Forces

War Secretary Pete Hegseth is moving to restore the U.S. Army's Chaplain Corps to its original purpose: shepherding souls....

December 22, 2025Back To Square One: Hamas, Hezbollah, And Iran Rebuild For The Next War

History has a cruel way of repeating itself when its lessons are ignored. Barely months after the world exhaled in relief at the prospect ...

December 20, 2025Scientists Sound The Alarm About 3 Major Fault Zones In The United States

Will 2026 be a year of great shaking for the United States? The dozens of earthquakes that have been rattling the New Madrid fault zone si...

December 20, 2025Are You Paying Attention? - 6 Nations Join Board Of Peace With More To Follow

In a televised address to the nation this week, President Trump boldly declared that "we now have peace in the Middle East," framing the r...

December 20, 2025NY Times Joins War On Homeschooling, Challenges Parental Control In Education

The New York Times has called for massive new government controls over homeschool families. It comes just weeks after the UN released a sh...

Get Breaking News