ARTICLE

Jack Phillips Before The Supreme Court: "Tolerance Is a Two-Way Street"

News Image By John Stonestreet/Breakpoint.org December 07, 2017
Share this article:

I was honored yesterday to rally in support of Jack Phillips on the steps outside the Supreme Court. Now I'd like to tell you what went on inside.

Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Masterpiece Cake Shop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Eric Metaxas and I have given you the details before, of Colorado master cake designer Jack Phillips who declined to design a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.

As David Brooks wrote in yesterday's New York Times, "Phillips is not trying to restrict gay marriage or gay rights; he's simply asking not to be forced to take part."


Neither the couple or the state of Colorado saw it that way. Phillips was found to have violated the state's anti-discrimination law, and forced to choose between his convictions and losing forty percent of his business. Phillips appealed to the Supreme Court.

While Phillips's actions were grounded in his religious beliefs, the legal argument was primarily about whether Colorado had violated his right to free speech.  Unlike those commentators who disparaged the idea that creating custom cakes constitutes a form of speech, yesterday the Court took the question seriously.

Phillips' lawyer, Kristen Waggoner of the Alliance Defending Freedom, argued that "the first amendment protects bakers such as Mr. Phillips against being forced to express any belief, and that as a custom-cake maker, he sketches, sculpts and hand-paints--in other words, he's an artist."

Waggoner had barely gotten started when the questions began.

Responding to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, she reiterated that neither she nor her client were challenging his obligation to sell his ordinary wares to everyone. In fact, he offered to sell the couple any already-made cake in his store.

Custom cakes, Waggoner told the Court, were a different matter. The use of writing and symbols convey a message in a way that a cake off the shelf does not.


Inevitably the comparison to race came up. The best answer was given by U. S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco. Francisco, in response to several justices, argued that discrimination on the basis of race, such as refusing to serve an interracial couple, was different than refusing to participate in a ceremony.

He also argued that upholding Phillips' free speech rights would not damage civil rights protection because it would only apply to "a small group of individuals" in "narrow circumstances." However, Justice Breyer disagreed.

But the roughest treatment was reserved for Colorado's Solicitor General Fred Yarger because of Colorado's treatment of Phillips throughout the whole ordeal. Justice Kennedy--likely the swing vote in this case--told him that tolerance must go both ways, adding that, "It seems to me the state has been neither tolerant nor respectful" of Jack Phillips views.

He cited a comment by a member of the Civil Rights Commission, who called Phillips' religious beliefs "one of the most despicable pieces of rhetoric." He then asked Yarger to disavow the comment. After Yarger lamely replied that he wouldn't counsel a client to say a such a thing, Kennedy pressed him, and Yarger disavowed.

It's never a good thing when a judge asks you to disavow your client's statement.

So where are we? Justice Kennedy definitely seems troubled by the way Phillips was treated, and it's encouraging that he insisted tolerance is a "two-way street."

Heartening as well was Justice Breyer's asking Yarger if some kind of compromise might be possible. Whatever else Breyer is thinking, he seems to be concerned that Colorado didn't make sufficient allowance for people with dissenting views.

I can't tell you whether Phillips will prevail, but there's reason to be encouraged. It's also possible that Kennedy could side with Phillips, but in a narrow opinion that would open the floodgate for future cases. Even then, that better, far better than a Phillips loss.

So let's continue to pray earnestly that Phillips, and freedom, prevails.

Originally published at Breakpoint.org - reposted with permission.


Other News

December 11, 2018U.S. Life Expectancy Falling - The 2 Biggest Reasons Why Will Surprise You

When I was growing up, life expectancy was continually rising, and it was generally believed that it would keep rising for many decades to...

December 11, 2018From Pearl Harbor To Salvation: A Lesson For Our Generation

Pearl Harbor was for the Greatest Generation what September 11 is for ours: a national memory. As we remember and honor those who served, ...

December 11, 2018UN True Colors Revealed After Failure To Condemn Hamas Terrorism

Thanks to the "peace-loving UN," December 2018 may well go down in history as the day the UN gave the green light to Palestinian terrorist...

December 11, 2018Your Tax Dollars At Work: Inciting Next Generation Of Israel-Haters On Campus

Thanks to the Middle East Studies programs as most colleges across the nation there is only one nation state in the entire world they all ...

December 10, 2018Historic Debt Is At The Core Of Our Economic Decline

A sordid theater of blame has exploded over the state of the U.S. economy, with fingers pointing everywhere except (in most cases) at the ...

December 10, 2018Liberal Churches: Compromised & Infiltrated

If the gay liberation activists could convince liberal denominations to support their cause and erode the resolve of weak-kneed churches t...

December 10, 2018Fog Of War Can’t Conceal Hezbollah’s Plotting

Hezbollah may be biding its time quietly at the moment, but it very well may retaliate – not just verbally, but also physically, in the ba...

Get Breaking News