ARTICLE

Antifa vs. Free Speech: Politics 'By Any Means Necessary'

News Image By John Stonestreet/Breakpoint.org September 07, 2017
Share this article:

America's founders believed that freedom of speech, the ability to express political and religious opinions, even unpopular ones, is central to self-government. 

Of course, this freedom, like all freedoms, has limits, particularly when it comes to putting others in actual danger. 

We can't shout, "Fire!" for example, in a crowded theatre.

However, an emerging group of radicals on the left has embraced a new belief: that just about any ideas, other than theirs, are not only wrong, but dangerous. And so instead of arguing or debating, they've committed to shut down expression by, and I quote, "any means necessary."

We saw this on full display two weekends ago in Berkeley, where so called "anti-fascist protesters" clad in black and wielding baseball bats and homemade riot shields attacked members of a cancelled right-wing rally. 

"Antifa," as these anarchists and leftists call themselves, reportedly broke through police lines and soon turned things violent.


Video shows vigilantes in ski masks and hoodies chasing down and pummeling Trump supporters with signs that read, "No hate." The irony, evidently, was lost on them.

In the end, police intervened with tear gas and made fourteen arrests. "There is a complete mob mentality here," James Queally of the LA Times summarized. "People are...accusing random people of being Nazis."

And therein lies the problem. Because although Antifa members style themselves as a citizen resistance movement against fascists, there's no evidence there were any actual fascists at Berkeley. At least not of the right-wing variety.

The only way to understand this behavior is to realize that, despite their names, Antifa is not just driven by their opposition to fascism. What they consider to be fascism is fully informed by their far-left worldview, and their embrace of far-left ideologies like socialism, communism, and anarchy--ideologies which tend to see their opponents not only as wrong, but as obstacles to a utopian fantasy that must be removed.

The Berkeley blowup was just the latest in a long string of riots with Antifa at their center. During the inauguration in January, 230 so-called "protesters" were arrested for smashing windows and starting fires. 

In February at Berkeley, Antifa demonstrators threw Molotov cocktails to halt a speech by Milo Yiannopoulos. The same month, the Portland city council was forced to shut down a public forum after Antifa threatened violence. 


In March, conservative political scientist Charles Murray was manhandled at Middlebury College, and more recently, Antifa members trying to disrupt a free speech rally in Boston, threw urine-filled projectiles at police.

The Department of Homeland Security, in fact, has designated Antifa's actions as "domestic terrorist activities" and has warned that more Antifa violence is on the way.

But until this second riot at Berkeley, the mainstream media have mostly refused to condemn Antifa's violence, with some even comparing them to the allied troops storming the beaches at Normandy. 

But as David French points out at National Review, unlike Charlottesville, there weren't any Nazis in California, Oregon, Massachusetts, or Washington, D.C., and still Antifa led with violence.

Thankfully, the latest dustup in Berkeley appears to have awakened some common sense. MSNBC's Joe Scarborough called Antifa out for "using violence to shut down free speech." Slate and Vox also put the blame for the Berkeley riot on Antifa. 

And the editorial board of the Washington Post unequivocally condemned left-wing thugs and called for a renewal of "democratic norms and the rule of law."

Despite my opinions about MSNBC, Slate, and the Washington Post as news sources, this is a step in the right direction.

People of good will on both sides must agree that the right to peacefully assemble, debate and even protest is a foundation of our Republic. And if left and right don't speak out against political violence while we still can, the price of speech will become higher than any of us can afford to pay.

Originally published at Breakpoint.org - reposted with permission.


Other News

November 23, 2017What Charles Manson Teaches Us About Terror

Charles Manson is dead at 83. We can learn from his story when it comes to understanding radical Islam....

November 23, 2017Palestinian Education - Raising The Next Generation To Hate

When Belgium funded a school for Palestinian children, it didn’t expect the institution to be named after Dalal Mughrabi - celebrated for ...

November 22, 2017A New Religion Forms That Will Worship A 'Godhead' Based On AI

This strange mix of atheism and radical transhumanism will worship a "Godhead" that will be created using artificial intelligence....

November 22, 2017Quran Sneaking Into Christian Settings

Allowing the Quran to be read inside a church is the equivalent of the ancient Israelites setting up an image of a false god in the Holy o...

November 21, 2017Science And The Bible

Would you be surprised to find out that a scientist has used the science of mathematical probability to prove that the Bible is the Word o...

November 21, 2017Radical Members Of Congress Oppose Israel Arresting Teen Terrorists

Nine members of Congress have introduced a bill to prevent U.S. aid to Israel from being used to arrest Palestinian terrorists who are und...

November 17, 2017Would You Get Chipped?

Earlier this year, Wisconsin-based,Three Square Market, announced that it was planning surgically to implant up to 50 employee volunteers ...

Get Breaking News